Search
Displaying 1 - 5 of 5
November 7, 2013
Risk Management Strategies
premiums versus 2012 in the
paper on AgManager.info at:
http … http://www.agmanager.info/crops/insurance/risk_mgt/rm_pdf13/AB_RAMII_CBO.pdf … Why not compare 2013 crop insurance corn strike price of $5.65 …
March 1, 2016
KFMA Newsletters
accessed at: www.agmanager.info/events/Finance/default.asp
http://www.agmanager.info/kfma … PATH Act.
Mortgage Insurance Premium Deduction: For taxpayers … restrictions,
mortgage insurance premiums may be treated like …
November 11, 2013
Marketing Publications
and the price paid by crop insurance in theevent of crop loss.1 Elevators … price on which their crop insurance
indemnity is based, they … 2). T
ture ones by
Barnaby 2010
sk premium
0.16
0.02
2002 …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …