Search
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
General Sessions
2012Risk andProfit Conference
General Session … receives about 8,000 high risk
calves a year. He finished … first make
business deals profitable for the other side, and if …
Breakout Sessions
2012Risk andProfit Conference
Breakout Session … at:
www.AgManager.info/events/Risk_Profit/2012/papers.asp
If you have any …
March 26, 2013
http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/beef/Cow-
calf_EnterpriseAnalysis(Nov2012).pdf
– Direct implication … http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/default.asp#Beef Cattle
January Cattle … 38.5 mil hd) that calved in 2012 -2%; lowest since 1941
– …
March 1, 2013
http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/beef/Cow-
calf_EnterpriseAnalysis(Nov2012).pdf
– Direct implication … http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/default.asp#Beef Cattle
Economic … Overview:
Feedlots
• 2012 closeouts were at historically …
July 18, 2012
Energy
Economics (C-FARE)
June 2012
Future Patterns of U.S … States of America. Copyright 2012 by the C-FARE Board of Directors … Resource Economics (C-FARE). (2012). Future Patterns of
U.S …
July 18, 2012
Cash Prices & Marketing Strategies
Economics (C-FARE)
June 2012
Future Patterns of U.S … States of America. Copyright 2012 by the C-FARE Board of Directors … Resource Economics (C-FARE). (2012). Future Patterns of
U.S …
September 30, 2016
Wind Energy Leases
by a grant from the USDA Risk Management Agency through … Agency through the
Southern Risk Management Education Center … Councils. These are
non-profit organizations that operate …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …