Search
Displaying 31 - 40 of 41
September 14, 2016
Mandatory Price Reporting
Jones, 2004; Key and
McBride, 2007; McGrann2007; O’Donoghue et al., 2011 … and Schroeder 2014; Taylor, 2007) and the data (e.g., Ball … enough, a niche
attribute will transition to a commodity attribute …
April 12, 2024
International Grain Markets
Suez Canal – Daily Transit Calls … Panama Canal – Daily Transit Calls …
August 20, 2013
Land Buying and Valuing
USDA) in 1997, 2002, and 2007, and by the U.S. Dept. of … that revisions following the 2007 Census impacted
also the … KS 5.56 2.42 6.59 0.23 3.70 1.67 5.43 36.69 1880 1910 -0.12%
AL 5.23 2.39 8.03 0.08 4.68 1.86 6.63 29.81 1881 1911 -0.12%
AR 6.00 2.43 7.61 0.14 3.97 1.81 5.84 31.92 1882 1912 0.00%
AZ 2.41 0.43 4.77 2.07 3.41 1.17 4.62 8.96 1883 1913 0.20%
CA 3.45 0.70 4.89 0.13 2.19 3.14 5.40 14.33 1884 1914 0.36%
CO 5.41 2.04 6.86 0.21 4.41 1.95 6.45 29.72 1885 1915 0.40%
FL 2.21 0.66 3.30 0.18 5.17 2.53 7.83 19.92 1886 1916 0.64%
GA 4.78 1.59 8.02 0.26 5.25 2.34 7.71 19.82 1887 1917 1.18%
IA 5.76 2.62 6.35 0.34 4.87 1.48 6.42 41.30 1888 1918 1.72%
ID 6.62 3.95 8.17 0.36 4.04 1.14 5.23 48.29 1889 1919 2.20%
IL 4.70 2.38 5.33 0.44 4.94 1.33 6.33 44.66 1890 1920 2.70%
IN 5.39 2.48 6.26 0.22 4.90 1.58 6.56 39.60 1891 1921 2.31%
KY 6.02 3.80 8.26 0.18 4.66 1.21 5.93 45.97 1892 1922 2.09%
LA 4.95 2.81 6.12 0.14 4.25 1.23 5.53 45.98 1893 1923 2.15%
MI 3.44 1.25 5.46 1.31 5.03 1.47 6.57 22.94 1894 1924 2.28%
MN 6.15 3.31 7.23 0.36 5.36 1.30 6.73 45.79 1895 1925 2.50%
MO 6.41 2.89 7.20 0.12 4.96 1.56 6.60 40.21 1896 1926 2.54%
MS 6.64 3.42 9.24 0.17 4.80 1.49 6.36 37.01 1897 1927 2.47%
MT 6.28 3.05 7.80 0.26 4.05 1.50 5.61 39.02 1898 1928 2.42%
NC 4.22 1.53 7.32 0.29 3.97 2.20 6.26 20.90 1899 1929 2.42%
ND 7.10 3.14 7.80 0.26 5.32 1.53 6.93 40.32 1900 1930 2.34%
NE 6.33 3.11 6.85 0.51 5.26 1.25 6.57 45.36 1901 1931 2.02%
NM 5.89 4.07 7.61 0.24 4.35 0.93 5.31 53.57 1902 1932 1.52%
NV 6.37 5.41 7.97 0.33 3.10 0.60 3.71 67.84 1903 1933 1.22%
NY 3.64 1.20 5.26 0.90 4.19 2.02 6.30 22.79 1904 1934 1.33%
OH 4.08 2.11 4.84 0.33 4.74 1.37 6.18 43.57 1905 1935 1.41%
OK 4.39 1.99 5.29 0.15 3.66 1.59 5.30 37.54 1906 1936 1.44%
OR 5.50 2.74 6.92 0.51 4.10 1.45 5.61 39.62 1907 1937 1.44%
PA 1.89 0.74 3.22 0.55 4.73 1.89 6.70 23.06 1908 1938 1.50%
SC 3.68 1.56 5.89 0.22 4.21 1.96 6.25 26.57 1909 1939 1.33%
SD 6.73 3.08 7.85 0.38 5.39 1.49 6.95 39.25 1910 1940 1.36%
TN 5.94 2.39 9.08 0.20 3.84 2.00 5.92 26.34 1911 1941 1.53%
TX 3.40 1.25 5.13 0.24 3.15 2.09 5.30 24.35 1912 1942 1.75%
UT 3.94 1.69 5.43 0.22 3.25 1.85 5.16 31.09 1913 1943 1.87%
VA 3.76 0.91 6.60 0.20 3.57 2.90 6.57 13.71 1914 1944 1.88%
WA 7.15 4.99 8.89 0.59 4.01 0.83 4.87 56.18 1915 1945 1.93%
WI 5.02 2.15 6.94 0.74 4.83 1.73 6.64 30.96 1916 1946 1.96%
WV 4.20 1.22 6.65 0.05 3.25 2.64 5.97 18.39 1917 1947 1.87%
WY 5.69 1.82 7.22 0.14 4.03 2.22 6.33 25.15 1918 1948 1.51%
WY 6.16 1.49 7.68 0.11 3.80 2.73 6.63 19.34 1919 1949 1.02%
39-state 1920 1950 0.56%
average 5.05 2.33 6.70 0.36 4.30 1.73 6.10 33.62 1921 1951 1.16%
1922 1952 1.45%
1923 1953 1.44%
1924 1954 1.46%
1925 1955 1.39%
1926 1956 1.42%
1927 1957 1.59%
1928 1958 1.71%
1929 1959 1.76%
1930 1960 1.91%
1931 1961 2.25%
1932 1962 2.67%
1933 1963 2.89%
1934 1964 2.82%
1935 1965 2.79%
1936 1966 2.84%
1937 1967 2.80%
1938 1968 3.00%
1939 1969 3.20%
1940 1970 3.33%
1941 1971 3.30%
1942 1972 3.07%
1943 1973 3.04%
1944 1974 3.33%
1945 1975 3.52%
1946 1976 3.43%
1947 1977 3.18%
1948 1978 3.22%
1949 1979 3.54%
1950 1980 3.86%
1951 1981 3.92%
1952 1982 4.04%
1953 1983 4.14%
1954 1984 4.24%
1955 1985 4.35%
1956 1986 4.35%
1957 1987 4.35%
1958 1988 4.40%
1959 1989 4.50%
1960 1990 4.59%
1961 1991 4.67%
1962 1992 4.72%
1963 1993 4.76%
1964 1994 4.78%
1965 1995 4.80%
1966 1996 4.79%
1967 1997 4.76%
1968 1998 4.66%
1969 1999 4.55%
1970 2000 4.48%
1971 2001 4.40%
1972 2002 4.33%
1973 2003 4.22%
1974 2004 3.96%
1975 2005 3.78%
1976 2006 3.68%
1977 2007 3.55%
1978 2008 3.42%
1979 2009 3.13%
1980 2010 2.83%
1981 2011 2.62%
1982 2012 2.50%
Data …
that is contingent on future events• A formal claim follows … by employero Parking and transit passes
pp. B171-174
Loans …
Summary Book - All Counties
60,172$
2007 390,616$ 276,193 … 2020 certai n l y was an
event f u l year for farme r s …
June 1, 2009
Water Policy
Fuglie, MacDonald, and Ball, 2007). However, in this scenario … associated with
extreme events like drought and high energy … Department of Water Resources, 2007).
Although California …
August 1, 2011
Land Buying and Valuing
USDA) in 1997, 2002, and 2007, and by the U.S. Dept. of … that revisions following the 2007 Census impacted
also the …
October 1, 2015
USDA METSS Project
1)
where S is the nominal exchange rate, P is the U.S. price level and P* is the price level in the country of
interest, say Ghana. When the real exchange rate is appreciating, it means the U.S. price of the bundle
3
of goods in the basket is increasing relative to the Ghanaian price. Now, when the real exchange rates
appreciates, then the real value of the dollar has depreciated, suggesting a decline in its purchasing
power, relatively speaking.
To get to know how Q affects the poverty level, it is necessary to try to understand the factors that
influence changes in Q. The real exchange rate between the currencies of the two countries may
change when there is a change in the relative demand for U.S. goods as a result of preference shift,
leading to total expenditure on U.S. goods increasing. The shift may arise from two principal sources.
An increase in global private and public demand for U.S. goods is one source of such shifts. This shift is
exacerbated when the relative increase in demand for U.S. goods is much higher than the increase in
demand for Ghana goods. In an increasingly interconnected world, imports tend to account increasing
share of development countries’ consumption. Another source of the shift is an increase in U.S.
Government expenditure on U.S. goods, an event that increases during rec …
January 1, 2011
Land Leasing
Forms
systems that allow for
an easy transition for new operators may
enhance … 4.3% 6.4% 2.5% 4.8% 2.4%
2007 4.2% 6.1% 2.4% 4.7% 2.1%
2008 …