Search
Displaying 1 - 10 of 13
February 6, 2017
Probability of Default
Change in Risk Rating 2014 to 2015
Repayment … the turn to the Cow-Calf profitability analysis.
45
ESTIMATED AVERAGE … that separate the top third profitable farms from the bottom third?
Managing …
April 1, 2005
Industry Economics & Trade
13
3.3 Beef Exports Decline in 2004 … of Feed-Ban and Specified Risk Material Policy Options .........................43
5.1 … Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Events …
September 15, 2021
Fed Cattle Pricing
DISCOVERY, DIVERGENT INCENTIVES, RISK MANAGEMENT,
AND FUTURE … well-informed trade; better manage
risk; and inform policy and regulatory … Marketing Cost, Flexibility, & Risk Management; 3)
Market Information …
September 26, 2022
Industry Economics & Trade
3.679
billion pounds in 2004 to a minimum of 2.056 billion …
November 1, 2009
Pork Quality Grading System and Wholesale Pork Price Reporting
100 articles in journals,
proceedings, symposia, or
chapters … research in
livestock market risk
management, beef demand … handling, food safety,
price risk management and
analysis …
November 1, 2009
100 articles in journals,
proceedings, symposia, or
chapters … research in
livestock market risk
management, beef demand … handling, food safety,
price risk management and
analysis …
September 14, 2016
Mandatory Price Reporting
scholarly publications,
proceedings, book chapters,
and extension … director of
the Center for Risk
Management Education and … research in
livestock market risk
management, meat demand …
September 30, 2016
Wind Energy Leases
by a grant from the USDA Risk Management Agency through … Agency through the
Southern Risk Management Education Center … Councils. These are
non-profit organizations that operate …
that is contingent on future events• A formal claim follows … 10/31
•Election period 60 days proceeding – 1/1 •11/2 – 12/31 … corporation?
Material participation?
At-risk limitations?
AMT adjustments?
Shareholder …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …