Search
Displaying 11 - 20 of 21
November 1, 2012
necessarily seeking to maximize profits as core goal …
• Returns … over cash costs
– 2012 (2013) estimates have fell over … AgManager
13
http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/budgets/production/beef/KSU_FactSheet_
ValueOfGainForecastingApproaches.pdf
14http://www.agmanager.info/livestock/marketing/graphs/cattle/prices/VOG.asp
Historical …
that is contingent on future events• A formal claim follows … 1120SoMust issue amended Schedule K-1 if those changed• In … carryback if applicableo Amended Schedule K-1s required too• Form …
September 15, 2021
Fed Cattle Pricing
DISCOVERY, DIVERGENT INCENTIVES, RISK MANAGEMENT,
AND FUTURE … well-informed trade; better manage
risk; and inform policy and regulatory … Marketing Cost, Flexibility, & Risk Management; 3)
Market Information …
April 17, 2024
Hog Pricing
also directs the
Center for Risk
Management Education and … Joe’s
work focuses on risk
management and policy
solutions … innovative, resilient
and profitable. He is a
dedicated leader …
June 28, 2018
Hedging & Options
… … an 50 years. The magnitude of capital at risk in the
industry together …
September 14, 2016
Mandatory Price Reporting
director of
the Center for Risk
Management Education and … research in
livestock market risk
management, meat demand … added to the Act. LMR is scheduled for reauthorization in 2020 …
July 18, 2012
Energy
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18
Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … required cuts in use in the event of short-crop conditions.
Livestock …
July 18, 2012
Cash Prices & Marketing Strategies
cost variability and greater risk management challenges ...........18
Figure … characterized by natural lag between profits and changes in slaughter … required cuts in use in the event of short-crop conditions.
Livestock …
April 1, 2005
Industry Economics & Trade
of Feed-Ban and Specified Risk Material Policy Options .........................43
5.1 … Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Events … months of age) as specified
risk materials (SRM) not allowed …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …