Search

Displaying 41 - 49 of 49
Enterprise Profit Center Summary
David Lambert Dr. Kevin C. Dhuyvetter Department Head Extension … ente rpri s e summ ar y present s the total crop ac r es … 100 -$50 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 …
April 26, 2018 Land Use Value Research, Land Rental Rates
for a more user- friendly presentation. Respondents to the survey … level. Tables 3-5 present characteristics of and leasing … Manhattan, Kansas, 2004. Dhuyvetter, Kevin and Dumler, Troy …
April 1, 2022 Land Use Value Research, Land Rental Rates
for a more user- friendly presentation. Respondents to the survey … 3 Tables 3-5 present characteristics of and leasing … Manhattan, Kansas, 2004. Dhuyvetter, Kevin and Dumler, Troy …
November 3, 2020 Land Use Value Research, Land Rental Rates
annually. Tables 3 and 4 present general characteristics of … yield, and revenue. Table 6 presents the average cash rent payment … http://agmanager.info/farmmgt/land/default.asp. Dhuyvetter, Kevin and Dumler, Troy …
January 21, 2025 Land Use Value Research, Land Rental Rates
15.4% in 2020. Table 3 presents general characteristics of … yield, and revenue. Table 6 presents the average cash rent payment … http://agmanager.info/farmmgt/land/default.asp. Dhuyvetter, Kevin and Dumler, Troy …
May 1, 2024 Meat Demand Research Studies
subscripts from equation (1) for presentation convenience. Our final … maximum estimates. Figure 3 presents the same information in visual … relative rankings, Table 7 presents rankings of the 50 evaluated …
Enterprise Profit Center Summary
David Lambert Dr. Kevin C. Dhuyvetter Department Head Extension … Each enterpr i s e summary present s the total crop acres for … Income and expenses are presented on a per acre basis and …
Enterprise Profit Center Summary
David Lambert Dr. Kevin C. Dhuyvetter Department Head Extension … Each enterprise summary presents the total crop acres for … Income and expenses are presented on a per acre basis and …
June 28, 2018 Hedging & Options
  INTRODUCTION  The CME Live Cattle Futures Contract has been an important risk management tool available to  the cattle and beef industry for more than 50 years. The magnitude of capital at risk in the  industry together with elevated market volatility present today makes having a viable live cattle  futures market of immense importance in price risk management. The viability of this market  hinges on how effectively its use mitigates fed cattle price risk for hedgers.     The performance of the live cattle futures market rests heavily on contract specifications. One  debated contract specification in live cattle futures is physical delivery as a way to settle the  obligation of a short position in the market. The delivery option is the main way cash and  futures prices for delivery settled contracts can be aligned in the delivery period near contract  expiration. Convergence of cash and futures in the current contract is conditioned on delivery  potential. However, a variety of concerns surround live cattle futures contract delivery. The  magnitude of concerns prompted industry and CME Group discussions to consider eliminating  delivery in live cattle futures and switch to a cash settled contract.2 Though certainly not new,  as switching the contract to cash settlement was considered in the mid‐1990s,3,4 the debate has  elevated again in recent years.     NCBA has an established policy position supporting physical delivery settlement of the live  cattle futures contract.5 However, concerns surrounding delivery need to be carefully assessed  and evaluated to potentially improve this component of the live cattle futures contract. This  project was designed to identify and document concerns with current delivery and to provide  practical guidance to NCBA as they consider alternative physical delivery mechanisms in the live  cattle futures market.     The range of sentiments of cattle market participants we interviewed for this study ranged  from those who thought the contract worked very well to those who see the contract and  physical delivery as outdated and inconsistent with the modern live cattle industry.    …