Search
Displaying 541 - 550 of 749
March 22, 2023
Recent Videos
rental rates
Issues from surveys of county rental rates◦ … be outdated – time from survey until reported◦ Truthfulness … reported◦ Truthfulness in survey responses◦ …
March 2, 2012
of risk
do you most worry about?
1 2 3 4 5
0% 0% 0%0%0%
1 … costs are you
most concerned about?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0% 0 … Kansas Cow-Calf
Producer Survey (312 Respondents, 2009)
Rank …
August 1, 2022
General Sessions
Demonstrate our collective commitment as the state’s land‐grant university who cares about Kansans and their communities … We are “people who care about people and their communities.” … and we want Kansans to know about it and feel it.
Outcomes: Rebuild relationships …
August 1, 2022
2022 Risk and Profit Conference Recordings
Demonstrate our collective commitment as the state’s land‐grant university who cares about Kansans and their communities … We are “people who care about people and their communities.” … and we want Kansans to know about it and feel it.
Outcomes: Rebuild relationships …
August 15, 2025
Water Policy
County within GMD1. Details about the LEMA plan are available … Industry Accounts and the Annual Survey of Manufacturers. Retail … NASS) conducts hundreds of surveys each year on
issues such …
2020 Ag Lenders Conference Presentations
on: Lending that is originated outside of the “traditional” local branch‐loan officer model
Other important categories
2 stories about nontraditional finance
Story 1: Evolving agricultural credit markets• … Producer: What is the cost of to farm operation of different sources of credit?
2 stories about nontraditional finance
Story 2: Financial distress• …
June 2, 2016
Grain Market Outlook
Page | 3
I. U.S. Wheat Market Situation & Outlook
I‐A. May 10th WASDE & March 31st Prospective Plantings & Stocks Reports
On May 10th the USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) released its May 2016 Crop
Production report – containing U.S. winter wheat harvested acreage, yield and production forecasts for 2016 –
with information specific to the 2016 U.S. hard red winter (HRW) wheat, soft red winter (SRW) wheat, and
white winter (WW) wheat crops.
The NASS 2016 U.S. winter wheat production forecast was derived by USDA using a combination of a) an
objective yield survey, and b) a farmer operator survey – both conducted during …
June 21, 2018
Animal Health
2
The purpose of the research summarized here was to estimate the value of metaphylactic use in U.S. cattle
feeding and determine economic impacts on consumers and producers if its use were eliminated.
Procedures:
To accomplish the objective, a cattle feeding net return simulation model was developed to determine how use
of metaphylaxis impacts net return distributions. Net return distributions for high health risk cattle were
compared across three different animal placement weight categories (550, 700, and 850 lbs.) and two health
treatments (metaphylaxis and no metaphylaxis). The cattle feeding simulation estimated changes in net returns
distributions and translated these into short‐run producer and consumer surplus changes with and without the
use of metaphylaxis in treatment of high health‐risk cattle. Producer and consumer impacts were estimated
using a multi‐market partial equilibrium model that allows for changes in the feedlot industry to be transmitted
from beef to pork, lamb, and poultry final consumers through a series of market linkages, including international
trade.
Key Findings:
Use of metaphylaxis is most profitable when administered to high health‐risk cattle having lighter placement
weight. On average, high health‐risk 550‐lb. placements lose $104.46 per head; 700‐lb. high health‐risk cattle
placements lose $99.26 per head; and 850‐lb. high health‐risk cattle placements lose $63.36 per head when not
treated with metaphylaxis relative to treated cattle. Greater uncertainty in net returns is associated with no
metaphylaxis and lighter placement weights (see Figure 1).
The feedlot data used in this research was collected from ten large Midwestern feedlots which are
representative of traditional large scale production feedlots. These feedlots, on average, used metaphylaxis as a
health management protocol on 87% of 550‐625 lbs. placements; 23% of 626‐775 lbs. placements; 4% of 776‐
925 lbs. placements, and 26% of all cattle placed. These estimates are higher than those reported by NAHMS
surveys of cattle feeders of 68%, 18%, 3%, and 20%, for each of the three placement weight categories and
overall cattle treatment, respectively.
The value, metaphylactic application rates, and number of cattle placed on feed in a given year in each weight
class were used to calculate the cumulative value of metaphylaxis to the U.S. cattle feeding industry. If
metaphylaxis were eliminated, and cattle producers did not substitute into other health management practices,
net returns to the cattle feeding sector would decline by $532.18 million to $679.56 million annually if the
metaphylactic application rates were similar to NAHMS or our sample feedlot data, respectively. These translate
to a reduction of 0.92% or 1.17% in industry gross revenue for NAHMS and our sample feedlot data, respectively
(see Table 1).
Kansas State University Department Of Agricultural Economics Extension Publication …
January 26, 2022
2022
http://www.agmanager.info/about/contributors/individual/tonsor.asp
Quarterly … GROWTH!
https://www.agmanager.info/livestock-meat/meat-demand/monthly-domestic-meat-demand-indices-usdabls-data
https://www.agmanager.info/livestock-meat/meat-
demand/monthly-meat-demand-monitor-survey-data
https://www.agmanager …
April 17, 2024
Monthly Meat Demand Monitor (Prior Years)
Meat Demand Monitor (MDM) survey responses from Quarter 1 … from the American Time Use Survey and can be found at
https://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/tusa_1tab1.htm … Additional questions in the MDM survey
capture respondents’ strength …