Search
Displaying 61 - 70 of 185
February 14, 2012
NOV DEC
Mil. Head
Avg.
2005-
09
2010
2011
C-N-08
01/20/12Livestock … Oct Nov Dec
Index
Avg.
2005-
09
2010
2011
01/19/12Livestock … Oct Nov Dec
Index
Avg.
2005-
09
2010
2011
01/19/12Livestock …
October 8, 2021
Ag Law Issues
topic of today’s post.
2005 Modified Tax Provision
The2005 Bankruptcy Code allows a … the core problem that the 2005 provision was attempting … address.
Nothing in the 2005 legislation specified when …
Annual Book
Crop Net Return Comparison, 2005-2010 … Crop Net Return Comparison, 2005-2010 … Crop Net Return Comparison, 2005-2010 …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …
December 1, 2011
Montana, suggest that both events
adversely affected horse … relative magnitude of the events, however, may be quite
different … Price1
2004 -- -- -- 320 1,166 825
2005 402 1,558 1,300 527 1,690 …
September 19, 2011
Macro and Global Economic Perspectives
Unemployment Rate
9/11/2001
Event date
Forecasted
Unemployment … 2001 2007
Source: USDA
2005 Constant Dollars (Billions … 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Nebraska Cash Rent-to-Land …
September 19, 2011
Swine
Unemployment Rate
9/11/2001
Event date
Forecasted
Unemployment … 2001 2007
Source: USDA
2005 Constant Dollars (Billions … 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
Nebraska Cash Rent-to-Land …
March 16, 2009
2003-2008)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
20
03
20
03
20
03
20
03
20
04
20
04
20
04
20
04
20
05
20
05
20
05
20
05
20
06
20
06
20
06
20
06
20
07
20
07
20
07
20
07
20
08
20
08
20
08
20
08
Pork
Poultry
Beef
Westland/Hallmark; Chino, CA Event:
6
LexisLexis--Nexis Media …
March 11, 2009
8
Pork
Poultry
Beef
Westland/Hallmark; Chino, CA Event:
LexisLexis--Nexis Media … 2003 2004 2004 2004 2004 200520052005 …
November 11, 2013
Marketing Publications
by crop insurance in the event of crop loss.1 Elevators … Figure 1
den City, Hu
uary 2005 to
across all fo
ns during … on forwar
0.07 0.12
2004 2005
n: AM‐MRT‐2013
0.362/bushel
d …