Search
Displaying 71 - 80 of 191
Annual Book
38,081 68,520 70,390 56,131
2004 45,801 29,927 51,670 52,709 … income. Extreme weather events,
wide ranging opportunities … 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
%
o
f V
al
u
e …
September 26, 2022
Industry Economics & Trade
3.679
billion pounds in 2004 to a minimum of 2.056 billion …
February 20, 2020
information:
https://www.asi.k-state.edu/events/stocker-
conference.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTyq3SuZn
8&list=PLst4YxRiGX9RSG0UO4WcavXCkwJmQz7Iw
&index=2&t=0s
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 … 1967-79
1979-90 1990-04 2004-14 2014-20
Data Source …
February 21, 2020
information:
https://www.asi.k-state.edu/events/stocker-
conference.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpTyq3SuZn
8&list=PLst4YxRiGX9RSG0UO4WcavXCkwJmQz7Iw
&index=2&t=0s
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
0 … 1967-79
1979-90 1990-04 2004-14 2014-20
Data Source …
January 1, 2009
Animal ID & Traceability
The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting
full animal tracing for just the bovine sector. The bovine sector is the
focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and
poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.
Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are
if by doing nothing we also lose export market access. We are likely to
lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,
even without any major market or major animal disease event, because
the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing
systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less
market access.
Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef
sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices
(i.e., status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export
market losses for beef. If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing
happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss. If we do
nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef
industry will suffer losses. The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if
we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share. To put
this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South
Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.
Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo
with Varying Export Market Losses
Export Market Loss Incurred
0% …
November 15, 2012
Risk Management Strategies
“Last year, weather-
related events led to crop insurance claims … 44%
2005 77% 24% 23% 47% 32%
2004 38% 58% 31% 103% 51%
2003 … 237,113 14,805 0.94 2.03
2004 130 19,726 5,076,235 354,512 …
June 25, 2019
Feeder Cattle Pricing
1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 … change from 1990 to about 2004, hovering
around 2,000 … daily. This changed around 2004–2005 as daily volumes began …
September 15, 2021
Fed Cattle Pricing
with black-swan types of events have raised
concerns about … adverse impacts of
such events. However, we advise careful … careful separation of how these events adversely
affected market …
July 3, 2019
Precision Ag and Technology Articles
Rohrer et al., 2019; Ward,
2004) may be subjected to most … also the failsafe in the event questions arise regarding … would allow recourse in the event of misappropriation of data …
March 1, 2013
1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013
Mil. Head
Beef
Dairy
C-N-02
02/04/13
-2.9 … 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013
Mil. Head
C-N-30
02/04/13Livestock … 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013
Mil. Head
C-N-38
02/04/13
+1.9 …