Search

Displaying 61 - 70 of 153
January 1, 2006 Animal ID & Traceability
liability recourse in the event of a legal claim by future … Australia 13-� (USDA/NASS, 2002; MLA, 2004). Feedlots in … historically exported (USDA, 2002). In contrast, the Australian …
April 30, 2024 Ag Law Issues
unquestionably a wetland. In 2002, an attempt was made to place … determination, and in late 2002 the NRCS made a “routine … field that had been used in 2002, and also determined that …
January 1, 2009 Animal ID & Traceability
    The first set of scenarios compare doing nothing (status quo) to adopting  full animal tracing for just the bovine sector.  The bovine sector is the  focus here because it is it the sector among bovine, porcine, ovine, and  poultry that would incur the largest adoption cost of NAIS practices.   Under the status quo scenarios, we further explore what the impacts are  if by doing nothing we also lose export market access.  We are likely to  lose export market access over time if we do not adopt NAIS practices,  even without any major market or major animal disease event, because  the international marketplace is making animal identification and tracing  systems the norm and any country that does not conform will have less  market access.    Table 2 summarizes the total loss per head to producers in the beef  sector, after all markets adjust as a result of not adopting NAIS practices  (i.e.,  status quo) under 0%, 10%, 25%, and 50% permanent export  market losses for beef.  If we do nothing to adopt NAIS, and nothing  happens to export markets, the result is no cost, no market loss.  If we do  nothing and we lose market access, which we believe is likely, the beef  industry will suffer losses.  The losses would amount to $18.25 per head if  we do not adopt NAIS and we lose 25% of export market share.  To put  this into perspective, this would be about like losing access to the South  Korean export market at 2003 export market shares.    Table 2. Net Annual Loss in Beef Producer Surplus from Status Quo  with Varying Export Market Losses     Export Market Loss Incurred  0%  …
August 1, 2022 2022 Risk and Profit Conference Recordings
Protection https://agmanager.info/events/risk-and-profit-conference/previous- conference-proceedings/2017-risk-and-profit-conference/14 https://www.marginprotection.com/ What … 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 … Manager https://agmanager.info/events/risk-and-profit-conference/previous-conference-proceedings/2017-risk-and-profit-conference/14 https://agmanager.info/news/margin-protection-insurance https://agmanager.info/crop-insurance/crop-insurance-papers-and-information/margin-protection-crop-insurance-coverage-comes https://agmanager.info/crop-insurance/crop-insurance-papers-and-information/margin-protection-crop-insurance-premiums-and I …
May 23, 2024 Ag Law Issues
1999, but accelerated in 2002 As a result of a Canadian … to trace livestock in the event that disease is found, which … for rodeo or recreational events; and cattle and bison of …
June 20, 2016 Financial Management
                                                                                                                                    1  Management Factors: What is Important, Costs, Yields, Prices, or  Production Practices?      Cooper Morris (cooper.h.morris@gmail.com), Elizabeth Yeager (eyeager@ksu.edu), Kevin Dhuyvetter  (kdhuyvetter@elanco.com), and Greg Regier (gregier@ksu.edu).    Kansas State University Department of Agricultural Economics ‐ June 2016   http://www.agmanager.info/farmmgt/finance/management/MgtFactors05‐14_(Jun16).pdf      This paper analyzes the value and feasibility of farming differently than the local average in Kansas crop  production. It is an update of previous research with the addition of several new variables‐‐workers per acre,  machine costs, and crop input costs‐‐to answer additional questions (Dhuyvetter, Morris, & Kastens, 2011;  Kastens, Dhuyvetter, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004; Nivens, Kastens, & Dhuyvetter, 2002). Farms are broken down  …
March 14, 2013 Macro and Global Economic Perspectives
5,689 Number of Trading Days After Event DJIA During and After Great … supply Agricultural Commodity Risk Premium (Agricultural Commodity Return Less Risk Free Rate) Data: Dow Jones and Federal Reserve Board of Governors (author’s calculations) While the stock market has benefited from U.S. monetary  policy, what has happened to commodity markets? ‐75% ‐50% ‐25% 0% 25% 50% 75% 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Rate of Return 3/4/2013 5 1992 to 2006 • …
March 2, 2018
1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 … National animal ID & traceability 64 Heed insights shared at Cattlemen’s Day (https://www.asi.k‐state.edu/events/cattlemens‐day/video.html) • …
August 1, 2021 General Sessions
OUTLOOK https://www.agmanager.info/events/risk‐and‐profit‐conference Quarterly Forecasts … If presume cull cow revenue is 15% then break‐even 600# calf price is $170/cwt 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 ‐100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 …
2021 Risk and Profit Conference Recordings
OUTLOOK https://www.agmanager.info/events/risk‐and‐profit‐conference Quarterly Forecasts … If presume cull cow revenue is 15% then break‐even 600# calf price is $170/cwt 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 ‐100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 …